ESPN investigates OJ Mayo and Rodney Guillory
Last week, I was critical of people who came forward with secondhand, flimsy information alleging agent impropriety. Well, Louis Johnson, a former business associate of Rodney Guillory, blew the whistle on alleged improper relationships involving O.J. Mayo, Rodney Guillory (an LA-based promoter with a questionable past) and Bill Duffy & Associates, a sports agency. Johnson, who does have some character issues, spoke at length with ESPN’s Kelly Naqi.
A disclaimer: I am friends with Bill Duffy and Calvin Andrews. In fact, Bill gave me a nice endorsement quote for my book. I would be disappointed if it is proven that BDA was bankrolling Guillory, particularly without Mayo’s knowledge. I also know the whistleblower, Louis Johnson.
I’ve written a lot about the specter of agents providing direct and indirect benefits to high school and college players. While there are relevant issues related to NCAA rules and amateurism, I doubt I have anything new to add. Definitely read Yahoo!'s Dan Wetzel. And listen to Dan Patrick's interview with Sonny Vaccaro. My focus is on elite athletes negatively impacted by agents and their intermediaries who use money to buy them on the cheap.
I tell athletes, hypothetically, if the NCAA said tomorrow it
was no longer a violation to take extra benefits from agents and runners, I
would still argue strongly that they absolutely should not accept agents' money. The
reasons have been discussed ad nauseam on this blog. Most important, when it comes time to select an agent, I
want athletes choosing the best agents based on merit, not illicit relationships
and benefits.
A few interesting exchanges and tidbits from Kelly Naqi's investigation:
Mother's intuition
Kelly Naqi interviewed O.J.'s mother in February 2008
Naqi: Do you trust Rodney?
O.J.'s mother: No.
Naqi: Why?
O.J.'s mother: It's a mama feeling. I don't know yet. If Rodney's intentions are good,
fine. If it ever plays out that it's not, it's going to go be terrible.
Selling O.J. on the cheap
Lous Johnson on how much money BDA provided to Guillory
"I know
there were roughly anywhere between $200 and $250,000 in cash and other
benefits that came from the relationship with BDA.
On how much went directly to O.J.
"My best estimate would be maybe $30,000 max for him and the people that were
associated him. Most of that stuff never really made it to O.J. OJ really saw a lot of the
scraps. The fact of the matter is OJ has been pimped by Rodney."
Complicity
On whether O.J. was complicit in his dealings
Johnson: O.J. wasn't as complicit in some of the things that happened. And I think I've
proven that because he wasn't the direct beneficiary of a lot of things
that was happening.
Naqi: But he got something he wouldn't have access to he wouldn't to otherwise and he
got what he wanted.
Johnson: Yeah, but at the same time, how can you, I or anyone else really sit here and
blame him when his circumstances?...He played within the rules of the game. And this is the
game: runners, agents, shoe companies, other elements. This is the game. He had
no choice but to play it considering his circumstance, considering what was
going on in his life, considering how he was living.
The most direct, damning evidence
In an ESPN Chat on Monday, Kelly Naqi wrote, "OJ told [ESPN's Andy] Katz last night that he did not 'receive any money from
Calvin or Rodney or anything.' However, the cell phone number that Katz used to
get that quote from Mayo was the same number that shows up on Mayo's September
cell phone bill, which we obtained, which shows that that number was billed to
Guillory's non-profit organization in California called the ICR Foundation. We
also obtained proof that Guillory made the initial purchase of that particular
cell phone of OJ's."
Best warning since, "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States"
In an October 2006 article CBSSportsline's Greg Doyel forewarned: "Burned by Bush, Southern California should be of wary Mayo."
The fallout
While
Johnson's claim that he is trying to save O.J. is dubious, I think basketball on many levels will benefit from these poorly-kept secrets being exposed. Kelly Nagy said in an ESPN chat earlier today, "The NCAA has already contacted me about
my report. Based on that conversation, I suspect they'll be looking into
this." Stay tuned.
--Marc Isenberg
How come no one has questioned Louis Johnson's motives? Why has he come forward after he's been booted out of the inner circle? The timing just seems a little suspect.
Posted by: Debbie Spander | May 12, 2008 at 10:32 PM
Marc, you make a lot of good arguments why athletes shouldn't take money from agents, but you haven't "walked a mile in their shoes." These are young men who come from poor backgrounds. They work more than a full time UNPAID job. They know exactly what's going on: The NCAA gets billions from tv deals, coaches get paid millions and travel around on private jets. It's a crappy deal and everybody knows it. The NCAA can fill the public's mind with propaganda that these are amateur athletes, but let's be real. These top players are going to school for one year while they wait until they are eligible for the NBA draft, then they're gone. They may profess to love school, but the reality is they're being forced to go their against their will.
Posted by: Sam | May 12, 2008 at 11:39 PM
Under NCAA rules, isn't it allowable for someone who has a "pre-existing relationship" with an athlete to provide these kinds of benefits? I don't know how the NCAA determines whether someone has this type of relationship, but this might be a quasi plausible defense for Guillory/USC -- and also an unfortunate primer on how to circumvent NCAA rules.
Posted by: Sanders | May 13, 2008 at 08:02 AM
Marc - good post. Keep em coming.
Sanders - the type of relationship you are referring to is typically reserved for family members and even then, the type of situation alleged, with an agency providing money, would mot be permitted.
Posted by: Joshua Golka | May 13, 2008 at 11:18 PM