Money

October 01, 2007

Spend like a champion today

The Austin-American Stateman crunches the big numbers spent on UT Athletics. A must-read article, but here are a few highlights.

  • The University of Texas athletics department spends more than $100 million annually.
  • "Fewer than 10 out of more than 1,000 college athletic programs nationally make money or break even, according to [NCAA president Myles] Brand."
  • "At Big 12 rival Texas Tech University, four in every 10 dollars of the school's annual debt service goes to repay loans taken out to build or rehab sports facilities."
  • "The athletic department this year will pay $1.79 million--$450,000 for the football team alone--to tutor and assist Longhorn athletes with their classwork. That's up more than a quarter from two years ago and works out to $3,500 per student-athlete, in addition to the regular $8,000 annual cost of tuition."
  • "University of Texas spends about $1 million a year recruiting and flying star prospects to Austin."
  • "Each year, it gives various rewards to players and personnel — letter jackets and blankets, but also rings, watches, iPods and other swag earned for conference victories and championships. The gifts totalled $537,000 last year."

September 20, 2007

Sonny Vaccaro goes Ivy League

Sorry Vaccaro exited shoe business earlier this year. He's focusing on creating a basketball academy, writing a book, and lecturing on college campuses. And Baron Davis, through his production company, is planning a bio pic on Sonny. Sopranos star James Gandolfini has signed on to play Sonny. (Thanks Michael McCann via TrueHoop for the heads up.)

Sonny Vaccaro may be a controversial figure to some, but I've always appreciated the open discourse he fosters. Over ten years ago, I sat down with Sonny for one of the most lively discussions I ever had about basketball, politics and the NCAA and we've been friends ever since.

Some believe Sonny helped create many of the problems we see today in the basketball biz. Shoe companies and also television networks have a simple mission: Generate more and more revenue. If athletic departments have a problem with these corporate activities, then they certainly could just say no. No, we're not going to play games starting at 9pm on school nights. No, we're not going to use our student athletes as shills. Sounds good in theory, but every time an athletic director signs another multimillion dollar coaching contract or agrees to take on more debt to finance construction of new state-of-the-art facilities, the less likely he or she is to walk away from lucrative revenue opportunities. To slightly alter a favorite line from Seinfeld: Not that there's anything wrong with coaches making millions of dollars in college sports and tricked-out practice facilities.

[The rest of this post is me shilling my book, Money Players, which you really should purchase.] While no one ever accused Sonny of being altruistic, I appreciate this charitable quote for my upcoming book, Money Players:

"I truly respect Marc Isenberg for his thoughtful approach to the problems facing big-time sports. He is as honest and tenacious as they come. Marc doesn't just complain about a corrupt system; he offers thoughtful solutions. If you are a college or professional athlete, or if you care about athletes, you have to read Money Players."
—Sonny Vaccaro

When Curtis Martin speaks, listen (or read)

Sports Business Journal did a terrific “In-Depth” examination on athlete behavior. The whole thing is worth reading, but the interview with former Jets and Patriots RB and the NFL’s fourth all-time leading rusher, Curtis Martin, stands out. Unfortunately you have to have to subscribe to the Journal or its sister publication, Sports Business Daily, to read the entire interview. Below are a couple of Martin's answers:

On being a role model

I take being a role model very seriously. I take it just as seriously as I take my performance on the field. So in the same way that I prepare for a game, I prepare my life—the way I do things, the way I think—in a manner that is worthy of being a role model. I realize the position I’m in and the influence I have, not only on my teammates, but on guys around the NFL who might look up to me in sort of a big brother way. So being the proper example for kids and fans and colleagues and friends and family is tremendously important.

On the pressure put on pro athletes by families
The type of pressure that friends and family can put on you is unbelievable. One thing that I always try to preach to some of the younger athletes is to get good at saying no. Most of us feel so obligated because we are the only one, probably in our entire generation of our family tree, who has had this kind of success. The whole tree comes after you. When to say no and when to say yes, on top of trying to have a successful career, is overwhelming many times...One of the most difficult parts of being a professional athlete is dealing with that whole tree coming after you, and dealing with the pressure of taking care of not only your own family, but every family that’s even close to you. If you don’t have anyone to help you sift through that process, it’s extremely hard…I think the general public equates wisdom with money, and there’s nothing further from the truth. People wonder, with all the money you make, how could you do something that stupid? I think that more money opens you up to doing something that stupid.

June 24, 2007

Sean Jones Speaks Yiddish and Gobbledygook

By Marc Isenberg

Last week, I posted on Sean Jones' arrest on bank fraud charges and a few of his past misdeeds. It's a sad, but not unfamiliar story.

A quick google search of "Sean Jones" and his investment firm "Amoroq" and you begin to see a disturbing pattern. Not only is Jones a bad speller with a penchant for silly metaphors, but he's also a slimy fraudster.

Back in his post-NFL heyday, Sean Jones was an agent, "representing" top NFL players such as Courtney Brown and Julius Peppers. He was also a financial adviser who founded Amaroq, which advised not only many professional athlete clients, but was also paid $60,000 per year by the NFLPA to provide advice about its pension plan.

Amaroq listed a “who’s who” of famous sports clients, including John Elway, Dan Marino, Jeff Hostettler, Corey Dillon, Ed McCaffrey, Harris Barton, Aaron Taylor, and Courtney Brown. In reality, these were clients of sports agent Marvin Demoff, who had some type of business relationship with Sean Jones.

Amaroq's website provides some interesting lessons about investing (along with nonsensical words, poor spelling, and bad grammar).

To wit: 

At AMAROQ we utilize computer algrorithms[SIC] to do the combinationatorial [SIC IF THAT'S IN FACT AN ACTUAL WORD] mathematics and to identify a limited number of candidate portfolios.

 And:

Scoring the game should be more than just counting the runs. We seek to go beyond the numbers of a manager or a portfolio of managers, and explain the "whys" of manager and portfolio performance. While a rising tide may lift all boats, it takes constant oversight in order to differentiate investment skill from market performance. [OR IF YOU INVESTED WITH JONES, YOUR BOAT SINKS]

Jones did provide some decent advice which clearly neither he nor Amaroq's clients ever followed:

Amaroq Asset Management is in regular contact with all managers charged with investing client assets, and when the situation warrants we require managers to report all account activity on a daily basis in order to ensure appropriate oversight and risk control. [OH REALLY?]

 And discussing its retirement consulting services:

We also assist our clients in determining the adequacy of communication materials, and developing customized presentations and materials for their plan participants. By allowing us to assist them, our clients have been able to successfully establish their programs while safely navigating the fiduciary waters that are so fought [THE WORD SHOULD BE FRAUGHT] with peril.

In a 2000 profile by Northeastern magazine (his alma mater), Jones said he managed a hedge fund. Apparently it wasn’t doing well. So bad, in fact, that he resorted to Yiddish to describe the fund’s poor performance. Said Jones, “It's putzing along. It's had its trials and tribulations”

Not only was Jones a former NFL player, but his firm once did business with the NFLPA. According to an undated ESPN.com article by Len Pasquarelli, “The problem for the NFLPA is that Jones' asset management company, Amaroq, is paid $60,000 annually by the union to help choose money managers with whom to invest funds. Documents that were filed by the NFLPA with the U.S. Department of Labor, and which were obtained by ESPN.com, confirm that amount.”

Len adds, "Jones has essentially been a poster boy for conflicts of interest since his retirement. He is noted as a 'prominent agent' in [a] magazine article, but rarely represents a player, instead turning over negotiations to Los Angeles-based agent Marvin Demoff, one of the pioneers of the business. And his cozy status with the NFLPA has raised eyebrows over the years."

Bottom line: I hope Jones' days working with NFL players, whether for a team or as an agent or financial advisor, are over.

June 18, 2007

Former Gamecocks sucker investors

Get ready for the next big SEC scandal. It involves South Carolina, but in this case it's the real SEC -- Securities & Exchange Commission -- that might have a keen interest in the questionable activities of current and former USC athletes and coaches.

Not again!!

Let's review:

In 1999 the real SEC (as in the Securities & Exchange Commission) shut down Cash 4 Titles, an auto title loan company. The SEC called Cash 4 Titles "one of the largest pyramid schemes in the nation’s history." More than 2,000 people invested $200 million with the company, including former former USC receiver Robert Brooks and former USC football coaches Brad Scott and Jim Carlen.

One of the ringleaders of the Cash 4 Titles scam was notorious sports agent and former USC assistant football coach Tank Black. In 2002 Black was convicted of stealing at least $12 million from several professional athlete clients.

Which brings us to the present. Apparently South Carolina is still fertile ground for money scams. According to a story in The State, ex-USC running back Rob DeBoer, founder of online music retailer BurnLounge, "now stands accused by the Federal Trade Commission of operating a pyramid scheme. DeBoer's partner is ex-USC quarterback and Gamecock football announcer Todd Ellis — helping turn Columbia into ground zero for BurnLounge."

According to The State, "Gamecocks receivers coach Steve Spurrier Jr. invested in BurnLounge a year ago after Oklahoma coach Stoops introduced him to the concept."

As a loyal USC assistant football coach Spurrier, Jr. isn't going to point fingers, right? After all, he's the ultimate coach's son. Actually Spurrier, Jr. in full-on-cover-his-ass mode, said:

"When Bob Stoops got me, he said, ‘I’ve spoken to a lawyer about this. I’ve spoken to my agent. I’ve spoken to some people to find out if this is a legitimate thing. And everything they told me, this is a legitimate (business). Put your name on it and go do it.’”

This appears to be a classic multi-level marketing scheme: a chance to easy make money, perceived credibility (even if none actually existed), and strong word of mouth.

UPDATE: According to Darren Rovell over at CNBC some pretty big sports figures are connected to BurnLounge, including "Shaquille O’Neal, who signed to represent the Web site in September. Danica Patrick, Dale Earnhardt Jr. and John Salley have been listed on the company’s materials."

May 16, 2007

The Devil made them do it

By Preetom Bhattacharya

The Tampa Bay Devils Rays have one of the lowest attendance figures in Major League Baseball for several years now. Rather than investing money in better players, the team has decided to take its act to nearby Orlando for a three game series with the Texas Rangers.

In a marketing ploy to increase the visibility of his franchise, owner Stuart Sternberg is hoping to make fans appear in the Magical Kingdom. "We're looking to build a regional power," Sternberg told the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram. "If we include Orlando in our region, we enjoy 4 to 5 million people as potential fans. Changing the culture doesn't happen overnight."

If successful, the series in Orlando could lead to increased television ratings in Central Florida and might convince Orlando residents to make the almost-100 mile sojourn to St. Petersburg, where the Devil Rays play in the over-ripened Tropicana Field. (The Juice Box has undergone a $35-million renovation over the last two years).

In addition to spending money on the stadium, the team provides free parking and allows fans to bring outside food into the stadium, acts that scream "revenue hemorrhaging." Unfortunately, an updated stadium can't help the Devil Rays squeeze more victories (just ask the Pirates). In the Devil Rays' nine-year existence, they have averaged just 65 wins per season.

The Devil Rays' business model is clear - profit is more important than winning. By keeping their payroll low, getting however many fans they can, and cashing in with MLB's revenue-sharing plan, the team is going to operate in the green almost every year. With all the revenue streams being split equally amongst the franchises in baseball, there is little motivation for Sternberg to field a winner.

That idea goes directly against the athlete's oath to preserve the integrity of the game by giving it their all. Owners like Sternberg who win money by losing are violating the basic trust between a franchise and its fans - albeit a dwindling number in the case of the Devil Rays.

Sternberg isn't completely at fault here, as the system that MLB has put together has hindered the competitive balance the owners and players hoped to achieve in 2001 with monumental revenue-sharing and luxury tax impositions. Money was handed out to teams with smaller revenue, but there weren't any requirements to spend that money on players. Small-market teams like the Devil Rays, Kansas City Royals, and Pittsburgh Pirates have owners who are resigned to the reality that lack of money makes difficult, if not impossible, to compete for pennants.

Their reasons are simple enough - the luxury tax hasn't deterred the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers, and Cubs from freely spending money in the free-agent market. So why bother trying to win when you can turn a profit by feeding on MLB handouts?

If giving one's all is a fundamental tenant of sports, MLB owners should realize that the current economic system cheats fans, as much as a player taking illegal performance-enhancing drugs. And steroid use is far more difficult to prove than objective measures such as wins, losses and payroll.

5/18 UPDATE
Devil Rays sweep Rangers, draw decent crowds.

April 13, 2007

Character matters, revenue counts

By Marc Isenberg

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell took unprecedented action against Bengals WR Chris Henry and Titans CB Adam “Pacman” Jones. Henry is suspended 8 games, while Jones is suspended for the entire 2007 season. Jones’ suspension could be shortened if he meets certain conditions set by the NFL.

The most interesting aspect of the suspensions is that Goodell had the express blessing of the NFLPA and players. Typically, players associations cry foul any time the League flexes its muscle. But the vast majority of players who conduct themselves in an appropriate manner have every right to be fed up with peers who repeatedly break the law.

“Just maximize revenue, baby”
Owners know they are competing for entertainment dollars among fans. They recognize that image, both good and bad, impacts revenue. The NFL and other leagues rightfully want to protect their golden images. The public wants its sports heroes appearing in United Way commercials, not with Nelly making it rain. (Of course, these long-running ads will never be the same),

In 1998 New England Patriot owner Robert Kraft, at his wife's urging, took a stand against players with criminal records. The Patriots drafted Nebraska football player Christian Peter who had been arrested multiple times, but cut him before he ever played a down. While many supported this tough stance, it certainly was the exception to the previously unwritten rule that off-the-field legal matters were handled by the judicial system -- especially when a productive player was involved. Three Patriot Super Bowl victories later, perhaps character really does matter. (Peter still enjoyed a long NFL career with another team.)

Roger Goodell understands today's competitive sports marketplace. The image overhaul is right out of the NASCAR playbook (No, not the one that says keep turning left.) NASCAR has sold the public on the total fan experience; devoted fans reward NASCAR teams by buying anything NASCAR-related, from cars to laundry detergent to erectile dysfunction problem solvers.

The perception is the "thug life" translates into lost revenue. And, as we've seen in the Imus controversy, moral order is largely driven by pocketbooks.

March 21, 2007

The $25,000 Question

By Marc Isenberg

Darren Rovell, who covers the sports biz for CNBC, is at the World Congress of Sports in NYC. He notes that NCAA president Myles Brand isn't opposed to student-athletes filling out NCAA brackets as long as it wasn't for money. Said Brand, "A student-athlete can walk into a supermarket and be the millionth customer and win a prize."

I have no problem with Brand's comment, although I am quite sure that brackets are used to not gamble for money about as much as bongs are used to not smoke pot.

Rovell then wondered what the difference is between Brand's hypothetical and Drew Tate, a University of Iowa football player, who in 2006 hit a hole-in-one worth $25,000, but was told he could not accept the prize money per NCAA rules.

According to Rovell, he then "spoke with the NCAA's Wally Renfro, who told [Darren] that he didn't believe that Tate's accepting of the prize was against NCAA rules."

No wonder we have so many problems understanding NCAA rules. Wally Renfro, senior advisor to NCAA president Myles Brand, has been working at the NCAA since the 1970s, and he just offered an interpretation that contradicted Bob Bowslby, then AD at Iowa. Bowlsby "let Tate know that he couldn't accept the prize. That would be against NCAA regulations, since Tate, the 2004 all-Big Ten quarterback, [had] a year of eligibility left." In Renfro's defense, he works in PR, not in enforcement. I'm guessing Renfro's interpretation is wrong, even if I like what he said.

Why would it have been against NCAA rules for Tate to pocket the $25k? Because the NCAA views a hole-in-one as a function of athletic ability, not luck. Payment for athletic skill violates the NCAA's definition of amateurism. Whereas filling out a winning NCAA bracket is pure luck. In reality, it is the opposite.

I have played golf since I was in high school and, at my best, I was probably a 12-handicap.

Here's my scorecard:

Number of career hole in ones: Zero
Number of NCAA tournament pools won: 2 (and I haven't participated in one in the last 5 or so years)

Hopefully someone from the NCAA can clear up the confusion for Drew Tate. I'm guessing the kind, generous Iowa boosters who organized the golf outing would gladly correct the mistake, if a mistake, in fact, occurred.

March 17, 2007

Do you believe in amateurism, flossing and miracles?

By Marc Isenberg

I am enjoying the heck out of March Madness, even if I felt deprived of the usual number of 1st round upsets and buzzer beaters.

Thursday night I watched a few first-round games with a friend. After CBS ran the NCAA public service ad ran for the umpteenth time, he blurted out, "That is such bull----." He then launched into the usual arguments against amateurism, including missed class time, poor graduation rates, coaches' salaries, the $6 billion TV deal. He concluded by saying, "Why don't they just forget about selling perceptions and, instead sell more beer?"

As a staunch supporter of the principle of amateurism (at least for the purposes of this conversation), I felt I needed to offer up some NCAA talking points: Blame the media for spreading lies about amateurism, focus on my experiences playing D-3 basketball, and basically continue to philabuster. Nothing worked. The more I played Devil's Advocate, the louder his counter arguments became.

Amateur is a myth, he insisted.

Apparently he is not the only one to hold this belief. Henry Abbott from True Hoops just blogged on The Myth of Amateurism. The Drake Group, a group of feisty faculty interested in reforming college athletics, also cries shamateurism.

These are smart people putting forth well-reasoned arguments, but what about the PSAs I keep hearing on CBS?

"There are 380,000 student-athletes and just about every one of them will go pro in something other than sports."

The ads reminded me of something I remember from a marketing class I took during my MBA days: In a study by marketing professors Patti Williams, Gavan Fitzsimons, and Lauren Block, one test group was asked, "How likely are you to floss your teeth in the next week?" They increased their flossing. Another group was asked the same question, but was told the question was being asked by the "Association of Dental Products Manufacturers." They decreased flossing despite its benefits, because of resentment over perceived manipulation. The study's conclusion: "Very well meaning organizations may have serious and negative impact upon those they intend to help."

Fitzsimons said. “In fact, they flossed significantly less than if they had not been asked a question. This demonstrated that consumers were willing to actually do harm to themselves to avoid being influenced by the sponsor of the question.”

I wonder if this study has any applicability to the NCAA PSAs.

What is the general consensus of people who watch these NCAA PSAs? Does it make you think about the 379,000 or so student-athletes who have nothing to do with the NCAA basketball tournament? Or does it make you think about the very athletes the commercials seem to be trying to draw your attention from?

It's an interesting debate: Rather than draw our attention away the Kevin Durants, the Greg Odens and the Brandan Wrights, the PSAs make many think about the "pink elephant." Ad time that could otherwise be devoted to making more money is now used to manufacture public perception about the NCAA and about amateurism.

At least if the NCAA had more money to spread to the membership, athletic departments could:

  • pay down athletic department deficits (since most athletic departments claim to lose money)
  • increase the value of an athletic scholarship to the full cost of attendance
  • ensure compliance with Title IX
  • say no to TV networks who want teams to start games at 9pm

Addressing these problems won't silence the critics, but neither will PSAs.

March 12, 2007

NCAA: Your friendly ticket reseller

Greg Johnson of the LA Times wrote an interesting article on the NCAA becoming a ticket scalper creating an exclusive partnership with secondary ticket reseller RazorGator.

The NCAA also plans to get tough on fans and other third-party brokers not named RazorGator who dare sell Final Four tickets above face value.

The NCAA "is threatening to blacklist fans who are caught scalping tickets anywhere other than RazorGator.com, the NCAA's official ticket reseller."

According to the Times article, this will be a difficult exercise:

"The NCAA must complete a bit of detective work before placing ticket scofflaws on its blacklist. Tracking an unauthorized ticket sale can be difficult because scalpers often list tickets with several online brokers. Seat descriptions are often vague — 'behind the basket,' for example, or 'at half-court in the upper deck.' But the NCAA maintains that it has tracked unauthorized deals during past Final Four tournaments, and will do so again this year."

I seriously hope the NCAA doesn't turn the Georgia Dome, site of this year's Men's Final Four, into a police state, looking for johns who picked up hookers basketball tickets on the street or online from non-sanctioned scalpers.

When entering the stadium basketball fanatics will be asked to raise their right hands: Do you swear the tickets you are about to present are pure and unadulterated? If not can you provide proof they came from RazorGator? And do you believe in amateurism? Okay, you may now enter.

Some fans may not appreciate the NCAA's price gouging extra effort to make more money, but remember it's all being done for the benefit of student athletes. NCAA's Greg Shaheen said, "[Ticket issuers would] rather that the money [spent for tickets] is going to the right causes, like scholarships, grants and financial aid for athletes."

He should have also mentioned the righteous cause of higher salaries for ADs and coaches.

I like capitalism when it's for money's sake. I just never heard capitalism cloaked so well in academia.

Money Players: The book