Retired players

September 13, 2007

The risks of football

By Marc Isenberg

We can all breath a sigh of relief that Buffalo Bills player Kevin Everett is out of imminent medical danger and he may even walk again. We all hope Everett can recover to lead a somewhat normal life. What happened to him is everyone's worst fear: that someone doing what they love suffers a career-ending (or in this case, a life-threatening) injury.

Society may love the finished product of sausages and football, but most would prefer not to know how these great American staples are made.

Injuries are an inherent part of pushing the limits of human performance, as professional athletes do every day. What happened to Everett last Sunday is everybody's worst fear. Football players may not fully grasp the true risks of playing (perhaps it's better they do not), but it is something that everyone needs to look at.

In capitalism, we compensate for risk. The saying goes: “No risk, no reward.” Think of the converse: In exchange for great risk, athletes deserve to be highly compensated. While many have questioned the NFL for not doing enough to help its retired players, NFL players are compensated for playing a violate sport. (They also receive medical coverage for 5 years after they retire.) Certainly more can and should be done to assist retired players, but at least this issue is being addressed.

At the same time, we should not forget where our NFL beasts come from. They are bred in the high-tech, win-at-whatever-price-boosters-are-willing-to-pay world of college football. In terms of concussive impact, college football is no longer a quantum leap from the NFL. It was once rare to have a 300-pound offensive lineman in the NFL; now I doubt there are many sub-300 pounders playing for a BCS conference school. Lawrence Taylor broke the mold for linebackers when he entered the NFL in 1981; today he is the mold--6'4 and 240 pounds of sheer terror.

A couple weeks ago Tim Layden wrote about the "The Big Hit" in Sports Illustrated. The article's subtitle succinctly frames the issue: "Players live for it, fans love it, media celebrate it -- and all bemoan its devastating consequences. The brutal collision of bodies is football's lifeblood, and the NFL's biggest concern." Layden follows up with another article this week, "The hits keep coming." Both articles are worth reading.

March 01, 2007

Pension benefits for retired pro athletes

By Marc Isenberg

There has been a lot of attention paid recently to the retirement benefits of older professional athletes, particularly those who played pre-1980. Greg Johnson of the Los Angeles Times does an excellent job documenting the issue facing MLB and the NFL and NBA.

Larry Dierker, a former MLB pitcher, earned $125,000 in his best year. Two years from now, when Dierker turns 60, he will begin collecting $180,000 in annual retirement benefits. Dierker credits longtime MLBPA executive director Marvin Miller for educating players about the importance of retirement planning. Thanks to Miller and the players who stood strong during some long, drawn-out battles with management, the MLB pension is the "gold standard for union-represented athletes."

Older retired athletes in the NFL and NBA are not so fortunate. For example, Conrad Dobler, age 56, is eligible to receive $24,000 annually now, or he can receive $48,000 if he waits until age 62.

As Johnson's article in the LA Times points out, "Federal law requires union leaders to represent the interests of current and future players rather than aging athletes, so improvements to previously negotiated benefits must be approved by current union members — and often by the franchise owners who foot the bills."

Two of the most outspoken ex-NFLers have been Mike Ditka and Jerry Kramer. They have teamed with several NFL legends to launch the Gridiron Greats Assistance Fund to "assist retired players in dire need due to the lack of adequate disability and pension benefits." Read and watch their presentation.

Since current players play an important role in directing retirement benefits of all players, there is an obvious dilemma. The question is, How much responsibility do current players have to past players? Further complicating the issue is the fact that the financial futures of current players are far from secure. The current system unfortunately pits current players against the legends of the game, which is unfair to both sides. As Babe Ruth once said, "Baseball is more than a fraternity. It is a family. And the fellow ballplayers are your brothers. In for a penny, in for a pound. All for and one for all." If there's a problem with retired players' benefits, it should be addressed by the Leagues and the unions.

The NBA recognizes the enormous contribution of the pioneers of professional basketball (See related post below). New NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell appears to be open minded on that front. During his first "state of the NFL" delivered at the Super Bowl, he said the League needs to "reevaluate to see what we can do more to address the issues and we'll do that."

Many former pro athletes did not partake in the financial windfall of playing professional sports. A few are hard pressed to cover life’s necessities. Pride often prevents them from holding their hand out. Fortunately, many former NFL stars, such as Ditka, Kramer, and Nick Buoniconti are speaking out on behalf of guys who really need financial assistance and support.

Current players should continue to fight for greater retirement and health benefits for former athletes, not just for recent retirees. All professional athletes should keep in mind that they will be active, voting members of the Players Association for just a few years. But they will be retired players for decades. Reaching back to improve pension benefits of retired players, particularly those who literally sacrificed their bodies to help build professional sports into a multi-billion dollar enterprise, is simply good business. These guys sacrificed their bodies -- and in some instances, sadly, their minds -- to make the league what it is today. They stood together though often very troubled labor negotiations, even striking on several occasions in order to improve wages and benefits not just for them, but for every player who followed. Fighting for former players sets an important precedent for future generations of professional athletes: Players take care of their own.

Resources
Mike Ditka speaks on retired NFL players in dire need of assistance
NFLPA's Retired Players FAQs
Gene Upshaw responds to retired players (Word document)
NBA Retired Players

Articles
NBA reaches out to its pioneers [Greg Johnson/LA Times]
The NFL's forgotten players [Ken Murray/Baltimore Sun]
Glory has its price: 25 years later, the heroes of the 49ers' first Super Bowl championship team weigh the costs of playing a brutal game [Ron Kroichick/'SF Chronicle]
NFL's cold-hearted stance regarding its vets is deplorable [Bryan Burwell/St. Louis Post-Dispatch]
Not much nobler than Lefty's good deed for Dobler [Art Spander/Oakland Tribune ]

NBA boosts retired players pension benefits

At the NBA All-Star Game in Las Vegas, NBA commissioner David Stern announced the League is improving pensions for all retired players.

Players who retired pre-1965 will receive a 50% increase in pension benefits. They will receive $3,600 per year of service compared with $2,400. Players with three and four years of NBA service will also be eligible for the higher benefit.

Len Elmore president of the National Basketball Retired  Players Association said:

"We're absolutely pleased. The league has been progressive in its generosity to do something for the pre-'65ers. There are a lot of organizations around the world who wouldn't look back 40 to 50 years at people who didn't qualify for a pension and try to do something to help them."

A lot of credit goes to Bill Tosheff, who played in the NBA for three years during the early 1950s. Not only did players pre-1965 need 5 years to qualify, but several players clocks stopped when they left the League to serve in the military. Tosheff spent years lobbying the League and PA that these years should be added back, which the NBA has done. Tosheff spent years reviewing old newspaper clips and other documents to prove that certain "pre-65ers" had enough total service to qualify for the NBA pension.

Money Players: The book